Turn a proposed purchase into a reviewable decision with clear authority and evidence.
Keep the source record, responsible people and next operating decision connected in your own workspace.
7 days free · No card required · Your own workspace
A request that can be assessed
Capture the tool, reason, expected users, estimated annual cost, department and required date. A reviewer needs to understand the business need before comparing products or granting approval. Estimates should remain visibly different from recorded actual spend.
Review and approval are distinct
An auditor can verify information while the authorised administrator makes the final decision. Keep those stages visible so a reviewed request is not mistaken for an approved purchase. Workspace permissions determine who can perform each action.
Information before a decision
Ask for missing cost, ownership or commercial terms instead of approving an unclear proposal. A useful review explains what is missing and who should supply it. Do not place private passwords or supplier secrets in general request discussion.
Approval does not complete procurement
An approved request still needs purchasing and implementation responsibility. Keep fulfilment connected to the resulting application, transaction or assignment where appropriate. A decision should not automatically be described as a settled invoice or active supplier service.
A clear request history
Preserve the request, verification, decision and relevant notes through the handover. This helps another reviewer understand why a purchase was accepted or rejected. Reassess changed requirements rather than treating an old approval as unlimited authority for future expense.
Begin with the operating question
The purpose of requests & approvals is to help you turn a proposed purchase into a reviewable decision with clear authority and evidence. Start by describing the decision you need to make rather than entering records without a review purpose. A useful example is a review of request, requester, review stage, decision for an asset with a named owner. That scenario gives the team a concrete reason to collect accurate information.
Collect the information that changes the decision
Focus on Request, Requester, Review stage, Decision. These details give a reviewer enough context to verify the record and ask a specific next question. Unknown values should remain visible as information gaps. Guessing a number, date or relationship can make a subsequent cost or ownership review look more certain than it is.
Make the responsible roles explicit
For requests & approvals, the person supplying information may be different from the person approving a change. The operating scenario involving a review of request, requester, review stage, decision for an asset with a named owner shows why those roles matter. Name the operating owner, identify the decision authority and grant access according to the actual work instead of assuming every teammate needs full workspace access.
Connect the source records
Use related inventory, supplier, transaction and lifecycle information when it supports the aim to turn a proposed purchase into a reviewable decision with clear authority and evidence. A relationship should describe what the team has verified. Similar names, old notes or a blank field are not proof that services are connected or unnecessary. Keep the current record close to its commercial context.
Requests & approvals questions
Which information should accompany a software purchase request?
Capture the tool, reason, expected users, estimated annual cost, department and required date. A reviewer needs to understand the business need before comparing products or granting approval. Estimates should remain visibly different from recorded actual spend. Explain the need and expected capacity.
How do requester, auditor and approver responsibilities differ?
An auditor can verify information while the authorised administrator makes the final decision. Keep those stages visible so a reviewed request is not mistaken for an approved purchase. Workspace permissions determine who can perform each action. Confirm the stage and responsible authority.
When should a purchase request be compared with existing subscriptions?
Ask for missing cost, ownership or commercial terms instead of approving an unclear proposal. A useful review explains what is missing and who should supply it. Do not place private passwords or supplier secrets in general request discussion. Return a specific information request to the owner.
What should happen after an approval or rejection?
An approved request still needs purchasing and implementation responsibility. Keep fulfilment connected to the resulting application, transaction or assignment where appropriate. A decision should not automatically be described as a settled invoice or active supplier service. Link the resulting record after implementation.
How do I retain the evidence behind a procurement decision?
Preserve the request, verification, decision and relevant notes through the handover. This helps another reviewer understand why a purchase was accepted or rejected. Reassess changed requirements rather than treating an old approval as unlimited authority for future expense. Record the final outcome and next action.
Bring your digital assets into focus.
Start with seven days to organise the services, costs and responsibilities your team depends on.
No card required. Your trial expiry stays visible in your profile.